Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Jack Edward's avatar

"The problem with asking if games are art is that the answer can be as simple and as complicated as you have time for."

I actually think there is a separate danger. When someone asks "are games art?" I think they are provoking a different question, which is: "Is there a better reason to play a game than to have fun." A similar question is "are games therapeutic?" I think most of us would respond to "are games therapeutic?" with "Maybe, but nobody running a game should be trying to do therapy." In a similar way, I think we can say "Sure yeah, games are art, but primarily they are a way to have fun with one another." Or maybe that's not obvious!

Expand full comment
Jesper's avatar

To me the true art of RPG creation comes from the interaction between the game designer and the people playing it at the table. The goal of all art (well, perhaps I shouldn't say all but eh) is to convey a certain feeling or experience upon the audience. Games are a unusual (though not unique) form of art because they are highly interactive. This gives them a much greater opportunity for creating strong emotions, but also makes it a lot trickier because the designer really has very little control over how the game will actually be played at the table. But even that is not all that unique, as every piece of art only becomes true art by being interpreted by its audience. So yes, games are art.

Expand full comment
3 more comments...

No posts